From: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commitfest process |
Date: | 2008-03-08 08:40:41 |
Message-ID: | 47D25109.1040406@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> But I also agree with Josh Drake's comment about a single point of
> entry. If patch authors are updating the wiki, and reviewers are
> using the wiki to guide their efforts, what purpose does the -patches
> mailing list serve? Does sending an email to -patches on top of
> submitting the patch on the wiki actually buy us anything? It seems
> redundant.
The mail to -patches will contain a detailed description of the patch,
the wiki item is just a one-liner. All discussions will happen on the
mailing list. If there's no initial mail there, there's nothing to click
"reply" on. And mailing lists provide an archive.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-03-08 09:35:26 | Re: CopyReadLineText optimization |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-03-08 07:50:37 | Re: Commitfest process |