| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest process |
| Date: | 2008-03-07 20:09:45 |
| Message-ID: | 47D1A109.20709@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> The main point of my proposal is: let's make the *authors* who want
> their stuff to be reviewed as part of a commitfest do the extra work.
> There would be no extra work required for patch reviewers.
>
I think this makes the most sense. It distributes the work to authors
who know the most about the patch/feature and have probably followed all
discussions related to it. Updating a wiki or something similar is a
brainless activity.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-07 20:20:46 | Re: Autovacuum and OldestXmin |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-07 20:06:24 | Re: [PATCHES] a tsearch2 (8.2.4) dictionary that only filters out stopwords |