Re: WIP: guc enums

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: guc enums
Date: 2008-03-05 15:03:22
Message-ID: 47CEB63A.3060606@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Having to have two extra hook functions for every variable
> seems like a lot of notational overhead for not much gain.
>

+1

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-03-05 15:20:27 Re: WIP: guc enums
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-03-05 14:50:02 Re: CopyReadLineText optimization