Re: Connect to postgres from a dynamic IP

From: paul rivers <rivers(dot)paul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Collin <adderd(at)kkmfg(dot)com>
Cc: Jorge Godoy <jgodoy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, rod(at)iol(dot)ie, dfx(at)dfx(dot)it
Subject: Re: Connect to postgres from a dynamic IP
Date: 2008-03-03 16:40:42
Message-ID: 47CC2A0A.2030106@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Collin wrote:
>
>>>
>>> But make it "hostssl" instead of "host", to require some
>>> cryptography in the channel used, specially to authenticate the
>>> connection.
>>>
>>> Opening your access to everyone without crypto sounds like something
>>> you don't want to do. Specially if users can change their own
>>> passwords...
>>
>> My understanding is no password is sent in the clear with md5 per:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/auth-methods.html#AUTH-PASSWORD
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
> However, it depends on the sort of data you are accessing. Sending a
> MD5 password is all well and good but if your data consists of credit
> card info or trade secrets then you'll want that encrypted too.
>

Yes true, if your data is sensitive, go with SSL.

On the other hand, if you're sending credit card data around, you must
comply with the PCI audit regulation, in which case there is exactly
0.0% chance you're putting your database port on a public network.

Regards,
Paul

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-03 17:18:15 Re: partitioning using dblink
Previous Message Collin 2008-03-03 16:35:39 Re: Connect to postgres from a dynamic IP