| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Stéphane A(dot) Schildknecht" <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| Date: | 2008-02-05 14:10:25 |
| Message-ID: | 47A86E51.6090605@langille.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
I have seriously trimmed the To/CC fields and remove cert@
Please stop cross posting between the lists.
Stéphane A. Schildknecht wrote:
> We all agree. So the questions ramaining are :
> - what should be in the certification program
> - is an MCQ significant enough ?
> - are there people willing to watch every attendee answers or is
> possible to have an automatic processing of answers ?
> - who will decide who's smart enough to write questions and test ?
I think this answers your questions:
http://lists.postgresqlcertification.org/pipermail/cert/2008-February/000067.html
Further discussion should be directed to the cert list, as previously
suggested.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference: http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-02-05 16:24:38 | Re: 8.3 Press Coverage -- post links here |
| Previous Message | Stéphane A. Schildknecht | 2008-02-05 13:58:59 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | dawmette | 2008-02-05 14:56:29 | Is my db dead ? |
| Previous Message | Stéphane A. Schildknecht | 2008-02-05 13:58:59 | Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification |