From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andy Shellam <andy(dot)shellam-lists(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New sequence in 1.8.1 |
Date: | 2008-01-15 10:28:26 |
Message-ID: | 478C8ACA.9010701@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Dave Page wrote:
> On 14/01/2008, Andy Shellam <andy(dot)shellam-lists(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I see your point about it not doing anything after the column is created, as
>> a serial column is just an integer column with a new default value. I liked
>> the idea of being able to specify a different sequence to use with the
>> serial column, but having said that I can't think of many uses where you'd
>> want to!
>>
>> Unless you can make the sequence combo of any use (e.g. to change the
>> default sequence used when creating the column) I'd say get rid of it!
>
> Thanks Andy. Any more opinions before I start pulling code?
>
Getting rid of it seems better to me.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2008-01-15 16:12:24 | Slony I - Problem dropping a set from pgAdmin |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-01-15 09:38:01 | Re: New sequence in 1.8.1 |