Re: New sequence in 1.8.1

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andy Shellam <andy(dot)shellam-lists(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New sequence in 1.8.1
Date: 2008-01-15 10:28:26
Message-ID: 478C8ACA.9010701@lelarge.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

Dave Page wrote:
> On 14/01/2008, Andy Shellam <andy(dot)shellam-lists(at)mailnetwork(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I see your point about it not doing anything after the column is created, as
>> a serial column is just an integer column with a new default value. I liked
>> the idea of being able to specify a different sequence to use with the
>> serial column, but having said that I can't think of many uses where you'd
>> want to!
>>
>> Unless you can make the sequence combo of any use (e.g. to change the
>> default sequence used when creating the column) I'd say get rid of it!
>
> Thanks Andy. Any more opinions before I start pulling code?
>

Getting rid of it seems better to me.

--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glyn Astill 2008-01-15 16:12:24 Slony I - Problem dropping a set from pgAdmin
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-01-15 09:38:01 Re: New sequence in 1.8.1