Re: Memory on 32bit machine

From: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory on 32bit machine
Date: 2008-01-08 02:10:12
Message-ID: 4782DB84.6090303@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Geoffrey wrote:
> mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de wrote:
>> Am Montag, 7. Januar 2008 12:56 schrieb Florian Weimer:
>>>> Or would you rather vote for 64bit because there are no problems
>>>> anymore and postgresql runs fine on 64bit debian.
>>> We haven't run into any trouble with iptables on Debian etch, running
>>> on amd64 hardware. But we use only fairly standard iptables
>>> functionality.
>>
>> ok, thanks for this information. It was sarge when i used iptables
>> with 64bit kernel and it even failed to start up.so i'll might give
>> 64bit another try.
>>
>> Are there any other recommendations whether to use 64bit or 32bit OS
>> with postgresql? I just want to use 64bit if it as stable as 32bit.
>
> I'm curious as to why you would run iptables on a database server. My
> expectation would be that your database machine would be behind a
> dedicated firewall.

Why not? Security in layers and all that. :)

--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-01-08 02:19:33 Re: Performance problem. Could it be related to 8.3-beta4?
Previous Message Clodoaldo 2008-01-08 01:15:53 Re: Performance problem. Could it be related to 8.3-beta4?