| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |
| Date: | 2007-12-19 15:39:57 |
| Message-ID: | 47693B4D.6060900@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>
>
> Yes 0.1 s is imho good. Btw. m$ is talking about milliseconds
> (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316609)
>
>
>
We have seen cases in the past where these locks last quite a long time.
That 30s total timeout in rename and unlink was not chosen arbitrarily -
it's based on experience.
I think a retry interval of 0.1s here should be OK.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-12-19 15:44:12 | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-12-19 15:33:17 | Re: pgwin32_open returning EINVAL |