Re: Release Note Changes

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release Note Changes
Date: 2007-12-09 23:01:28
Message-ID: 475C73C8.80309@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> However as a user I find it helpful to get a kind of overview of the kinds of
>>> invisible changes there were so I can get a feel for the magnitude of the
>>> improvements between versions.
>>>
>> I agree with this as well. However, I am starting to wonder if the
>> "release notes" is the place for this. I am starting to think that
>> instead we need a white paper on the release (or each release) that is
>> categorized and reasonably in depth on "why" 8.3 (or 8.4 etc..).
>
> Sure, and we could perhaps put up with some gritty detail there, though
> it doesn't solve the problem of people's work not being mentioned.
> Seems that is a separate problem.

I assumed the white paper would have proper attribution.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-12-09 23:33:30 Re: Release Note Changes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-12-09 21:01:18 pgsql: The E.