From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |
Date: | 2007-12-09 14:21:12 |
Message-ID: | 475BF9D8.2020802@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:18 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:48:02 +0100
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>
>>> In an effort to remain productive... please see attached patch.
>>
>> Patch applied.
>
> Y'know, I'm still not so convinced about the new headings - 'Minor
> contributors' is the one that irks me.
>
> Consider that that section includes:
>
> Greg Stark - CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY, var-valena and lots more
> Thomas Hallgren - Pl/Java
> Francisco Figueiredo - Npgsql
> Christopher Browne - Significant work and ongoing maintenance of Slony
> Heikki Linnakangas - 2PC, major review work, concurrent scan, LDC
>
> Amongst others, none of which I think it is fair to call 'minor'. Now
> some of those should clearly move up into the main section (though thats
> another discussion), but I think we should reconsider that title. How
> about 'Other contributors'?
>
> Thoughts?
Yeah, I wasn't entirely convinced about that one. It used to be called
"other contributors", so I'd be fine with moving that one back.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-12-09 15:45:24 | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |
Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2007-12-09 14:21:05 | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |