| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |
| Date: | 2007-12-09 12:45:38 |
| Message-ID: | 475BE372.20906@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:18 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:48:02 +0100
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> In an effort to remain productive... please see attached patch.
>
> Patch applied.
Y'know, I'm still not so convinced about the new headings - 'Minor
contributors' is the one that irks me.
Consider that that section includes:
Greg Stark - CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY, var-valena and lots more
Thomas Hallgren - Pl/Java
Francisco Figueiredo - Npgsql
Christopher Browne - Significant work and ongoing maintenance of Slony
Heikki Linnakangas - 2PC, major review work, concurrent scan, LDC
Amongst others, none of which I think it is fair to call 'minor'. Now
some of those should clearly move up into the main section (though thats
another discussion), but I think we should reconsider that title. How
about 'Other contributors'?
Thoughts?
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2007-12-09 14:21:05 | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-12-09 11:56:59 | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |