Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance (now Solaris)

From: Jeremy Harris <jgh(at)vmetro(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance (now Solaris)
Date: 2007-11-28 14:42:02
Message-ID: 474D7E3A.8090602@vmetro.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>> > Only under Solaris. With Linux or BSD on it it ran pretty well. I
>> > had a Sparc 20 running RH 7.2 back in the day (or whatever the last
>> > version of RH that ran on sparc was) that spanked an Ultra-2 running
>> > slowalrus with twice the memory and hard drives handily.
>> >
>> > Solaris has gotten much better since then, I'm sure.
>
> Ubuntu is supposed to be able to spin on a T1000/T2000 and they have
> come out with a magical beast called Solaris 10 and in Sun's infinite
> wisdom they have decided to abandon the /etc/init.d/ and friends way of
> startup for some complex XML way of doing things. But otherwise its
> quite good (ZFS and Cool Thread servers being among the other good
> things out of Sun's shop).

Anybody here running postgresql on a T1000? What OS, and how is it?

Cheers,
Jeremy

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Bauer 2007-11-28 15:03:29 Re: System Load analyze
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2007-11-28 14:29:58 Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance