From: | Jeremy Harris <jgh(at)vmetro(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance (now Solaris) |
Date: | 2007-11-28 14:42:02 |
Message-ID: | 474D7E3A.8090602@vmetro.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>> > Only under Solaris. With Linux or BSD on it it ran pretty well. I
>> > had a Sparc 20 running RH 7.2 back in the day (or whatever the last
>> > version of RH that ran on sparc was) that spanked an Ultra-2 running
>> > slowalrus with twice the memory and hard drives handily.
>> >
>> > Solaris has gotten much better since then, I'm sure.
>
> Ubuntu is supposed to be able to spin on a T1000/T2000 and they have
> come out with a magical beast called Solaris 10 and in Sun's infinite
> wisdom they have decided to abandon the /etc/init.d/ and friends way of
> startup for some complex XML way of doing things. But otherwise its
> quite good (ZFS and Cool Thread servers being among the other good
> things out of Sun's shop).
Anybody here running postgresql on a T1000? What OS, and how is it?
Cheers,
Jeremy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Bauer | 2007-11-28 15:03:29 | Re: System Load analyze |
Previous Message | Scott Ribe | 2007-11-28 14:29:58 | Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance |