| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash |
| Date: | 2007-11-17 21:01:01 |
| Message-ID: | 473F568D.2060308@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Honestly, I think you are underestimating this problem.
>
> I fail to see why this is a major problem; and merely asserting that
> it is one isn't going to change my mind. Can you point to something
> like a major application that will be broken and can't easily be fixed?
SQL-Ledger/LedgerSMB
What I find interesting is that I (and Josh) are getting push back and
all we are trying to do is be a little louder about the change.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-17 21:05:50 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-17 20:52:53 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-17 21:05:50 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-17 20:52:53 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash |