Re: How to keep a table in memory?

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Luke Lonergan <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Alex Drobychev <adrobj(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to keep a table in memory?
Date: 2007-11-13 08:20:43
Message-ID: 47395E5B.3080009@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Vacuum is a better thing to run, much less CPU usage.

Vacuum is actually not good for this purpose, because it's been
special-cased to not bump the usage count.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-11-13 09:28:14 Re: How to keep a table in memory?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-13 08:12:47 Re: Simplifying Text Search