Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL

From: "John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com>
To: "Keith G(dot) Murphy" <keithmur(at)mindspring(dot)com>
Cc: johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com, "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-01-13 17:24:11
Message-ID: 4737.192.168.0.64.1074014651.squirrel@mercury.wardbrook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Keith G. Murphy said:
> Perhaps I can answer my own question. I could use ident and a map that
> lists the web server username as able to map to the different "role"
> usernames.

Someone else also mentioned and I personally agree that it's better to
authenticate in the application layer (using whatever technology takes
your fancy), and then use the webserver's generic/pooled connection to
communicate with the database.

Your user and role mapping info could be stored within the database, or
accessed from an LDAP server, or some such.

> Unfortunately, that still would allow the web server account
> to "fake" role names.

Make the application layer robust and secure and it may not be so much of
a problem.

John

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-01-13 17:34:14 Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects?
Previous Message Keith G. Murphy 2004-01-13 17:15:30 Re: Best practice? Web application: single PostgreSQL