From: | "Marcel Gsteiger" <Marcel(dot)Gsteiger(at)milprog(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |
Date: | 2007-11-11 06:59:32 |
Message-ID: | 4736B664.DB9C.0010.0@milprog.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
>>> Do you have glibc-devel installed? It sounds like you might be missing
>>> /usr/lib64/libpthread.so, which is in that RPM. However, we do
>>> BuildRequire glibc-devel, so I'm not sure how you managed to try to
>>> build the RPM without it.
>> glibc-devel-2.5-12 is installed, /usr/lib64/libpthread.so exists. This
>> is a very basic CentOS 5 x86_64 install from DVD, 'yum update'
>> afterwards. I only installed the packages that were in the
>> BuildRequire list of the SRPM.
>Hmm. I suspect either we're short a BuildRequire or two, or you missed
>something that's considered part of the standard minimum build
>environment. The "exceptions" list on this page shows what Red Hat
>considers the core set of packages that needn't be BuildRequire'd:
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions
>However, none of those look particularly likely to result in the
>failure you're seeing here :-(. Could you send along the config.log
>output?
Thanks for your tip. In fact, my "basic packages, customize later"-type install from DVD did not install the following packages from the mentioned list:
gcc-c++
libstdc++-devel
redhat-rpm-config
After I have installed these, everything now works perfectly.
regards
--Marcel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-11 15:18:50 | Re: Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-10 22:54:11 | Re: Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |