From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marcel Gsteiger" <Marcel(dot)Gsteiger(at)milprog(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |
Date: | 2007-11-11 15:18:50 |
Message-ID: | 18625.1194794330@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
"Marcel Gsteiger" <Marcel(dot)Gsteiger(at)milprog(dot)ch> writes:
>> Hmm. I suspect either we're short a BuildRequire or two, or you missed
>> something that's considered part of the standard minimum build
>> environment. The "exceptions" list on this page shows what Red Hat
>> considers the core set of packages that needn't be BuildRequire'd:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions
>> However, none of those look particularly likely to result in the
>> failure you're seeing here :-(. Could you send along the config.log
>> output?
> Thanks for your tip. In fact, my "basic packages, customize later"-type install from DVD did not install the following packages from the mentioned list:
> gcc-c++
> libstdc++-devel
> redhat-rpm-config
> After I have installed these, everything now works perfectly.
Interesting. We don't do any C++ stuff, so I would hope that the first
two of those are irrelevant. redhat-rpm-config, however, might well be
relevant. I remember Devrim running into an odd build failure on a
machine where it wasn't installed.
I wonder if it'd be worth explicitly BuildRequire'ing redhat-rpm-config
in the PGDG SRPM? I don't feel the need to do it in Fedora/RHEL,
because as mentioned there's an explicit policy not to for those
projects. But it seems the PGDG RPMs get rebuilt in a rather wider
variety of environments.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-11-11 20:36:54 | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |
Previous Message | Marcel Gsteiger | 2007-11-11 06:59:32 | Re: Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |