Re: pgstattuple locking fix

From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pgstattuple locking fix
Date: 2007-10-22 09:54:10
Message-ID: 471C7342.2040102@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>> Here is a trivial fix of locking issue in pgstattuple().
>> Hmm, is this really a bug, and if so how far back does it go?
>> I'm thinking that having a pin on the buffer should be enough to
>> call PageGetHeapFreeSpace.
>
> Hmm... we might use pd_upper and pd_lower at different times,
> but the error is ok for pgstattuple purpose.
> (It might be dangerous for tuple insertion, though.)
> Inconsistent usage of locks is confusable -- remove them, please.

No I think the original patch was right. You can indeed read
inconsistent values for pd_upper and pd_lower, though the window is very
small. But a bigger issue is that in 8.3 PageGetHeapFreeSpace counts the
used line pointers to see if MaxHeapTuplesPerPage has been reached, and
I'm not convinced you can do that safely without holding a lock.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-10-22 10:07:53 Re: pgstattuple locking fix
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-10-22 09:42:44 Re: pgstattuple locking fix