Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?
Date: 2007-10-18 17:16:06
Message-ID: 47174E86.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:23 AM, in message
<87ejfswfvw(dot)fsf(at)oxford(dot)xeocode(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> If it's set to 0
> then there's no real reason we need to wal log lock operations.

Do we currently take advantage of that fact, or log them anyway?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan de Visser 2007-10-18 17:17:39 Re: Can a C function(server program) be a UDP or TCP server?
Previous Message Billow Gao 2007-10-18 16:27:59 Re: Can a C function(server program) be a UDP or TCP server?