Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>

>>> Heck, I know plenty of people that just say PG, or PGSQL, myself
>>> included.
>> +1 I like it.
>
>> From a design standpoint, 'Pg' is nicer. I know we're not there yet, but
>> just sayin'.
>
> Just to clarify, I don't believe JD is advocating *changing the name* to Pg,
> only using Pg as the common name vs Postgres ...
>
> Right JD? :)

That is correct. I am *not* advocating changing our name to Pg. I am
simply advocating the idea that we are PostgreSQL, also known as Pg.

(the the Volkswagen metaphor)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
> Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG+/AgATb/zqfZUUQRAsbFAKCuUWn/IJhMjNln2QMEvvShGOUsCQCfVUwZ
RW03EpQGAtyowGxAo08BT4g=
=JhK4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----