Re: ispell dictionary broken in CVS HEAD ?

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ispell dictionary broken in CVS HEAD ?
Date: 2007-09-10 20:33:52
Message-ID: 46E5AA30.6040205@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Is anyone working on providing basic regression tests for the different
> dictionary types? Seems like the main stumbling block is providing

I make some small tests (http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/ispell_samples.tgz). So,
what is better practice to builtin it? Make it installable with regular
procedure into share/tsearch_data or install they only for regression db?
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-10 21:35:19 Re: ispell dictionary broken in CVS HEAD ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-10 19:45:44 Re: GucContext of log_autovacuum