Re: HOT patch - version 15

From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HOT patch - version 15
Date: 2007-09-06 15:48:33
Message-ID: 46E02151.2030407@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Pruning is going to take place on next vacuum anyway, isn't it?

Yes. If HOT is working well, you're not going to run vacuum very often,
though.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2007-09-06 16:03:57 Re: HOT patch - version 15
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-09-06 15:15:35 Re: HOT patch - version 15