-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dave Page wrote:
>> How do we go about getting 'official' approval?
> There is no formal process (yet), but I would suggest that general agreement (or lack of disagreement) of this forum (-advocacy) that the organisers are well enough known to be trusted and the proposed event is appropriate.
> Personally I have no doubts on either point in this instance, given that you and JD are involved.
And Berkus :)
> Regards, Dave
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Ned Lilly||Date: 2007-08-30 18:45:42|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Conference Fall 2007|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2007-08-30 18:22:52|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal