Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-28 18:42:59
Message-ID: 46D46CB3.9030303@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

Before anyone goes down this path too far it is very important that I
disclose (as I have on multiple occasions before) that Command Prompt
owns the name Postgres, Inc (and domains postgresinc.com/net/org).

Although we do not have intention to immediately change our name, I will
note that if the project changes its name, it increases the possibility
that we may do so.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1GyzATb/zqfZUUQRAsSTAJ9tO9G8mXmmVjyxEEih5FWVQqrm4ACffgs8
rZ2ljARoGxKVigtndKJnCps=
=om6H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Robert BernierDate: 2007-08-28 18:44:26
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2007-08-28 18:11:30
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group