Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Date: 2001-12-13 15:47:10
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA421285C@m0114.s-mxs.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwinpgsql-hackers
> > Right, 7.2b4 passes *all* tests both parallel and 
> sequential on Windows 2000
> > Server.
> > On XP Pro, and by the sounds of it, any other non-server releases of
> > Windows, parallel tests will fail randomly due to Winsock 
> backlog limit of 5
> > on these systems (as pointed out by Jason Tishler and documented in
> > FAQ_MSWIN).
> 
> So ignore the question I sent a minute ago. Thanks for the report!!

Problem with this report is, that it most certainly is on a single CPU 
system. Problems currently only reproduce on SMP, if I read the mails 
correctly.

Andreas

pgsql-cygwin by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-12-13 15:52:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2001-12-13 15:16:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-12-13 15:52:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Previous:From: Lee KindnessDate: 2001-12-13 15:44:31
Subject: Re: Bulkloading using COPY - ignore duplicates?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group