Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Date: 2001-12-13 15:16:15
Message-ID: 3C18C63F.61CB629E@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers

...
> Right, 7.2b4 passes *all* tests both parallel and sequential on Windows 2000
> Server.
> On XP Pro, and by the sounds of it, any other non-server releases of
> Windows, parallel tests will fail randomly due to Winsock backlog limit of 5
> on these systems (as pointed out by Jason Tishler and documented in
> FAQ_MSWIN).

So ignore the question I sent a minute ago. Thanks for the report!!

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2001-12-13 15:47:10 Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-13 15:08:57 Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-13 15:29:22 Re: Intermediate report for AIX 5L port
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-12-13 15:08:57 Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin