| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| Date: | 2007-08-05 15:29:31 |
| Message-ID: | 46B5ECDB.9030703@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>> The hard way, is exactly why we have neglected our partners (sponsors)
>>> to date, because of time, and resources. It is also the exact same
>>> reason that Berkus has *also* not provided a new sponsors page.
>> Ok. I have to admit I don't follow you - what exactly is your need? To
>> be able to dynamically handle *public* information about sponsors, or to
>> be bale to handle *confidential* information about them?
>
> Let's take this to another thread. After arguing with dpage about this I
> realize we might be talking past each other.
Wouldn't be the first time, and I doubt it'll be the last. :-)
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-05 15:35:58 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-05 15:28:20 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-05 15:35:58 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-05 15:28:20 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |