From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrei Kovalevski <andyk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: .NET driver |
Date: | 2007-08-02 22:19:36 |
Message-ID: | 46B25878.8080803@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Brar Piening wrote:
> Robert Treat schrieb:
>> That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers,
>> so I'd
> Your'e right - of course.
>
> But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their
> interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good interfaces
> and some of the PostgreSQL-interfaces don't reach the standard they
> are reaching for other databases.
> As a windows-user I still can't drag and drop a Dataset in VS.Net with
> Npgsql and I still have to build a single-threaded perl if i want to
> use DBD::Pg (I know about DBD::PgPP).
>
>
This latter is simply not true.
ActiveState Perl is threaded and DBD::Pg works just fine with it. In
fact, you don't need to build your own - just get the one from pgfoundry:
point your ppm at: http://dbdpgppm.projects.postgresql.org//DBD-Pg-5.8.ppd
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-08-03 01:57:27 | Tracking a snapshot on PITR slaves |
Previous Message | Brar Piening | 2007-08-02 22:05:54 | Re: .NET driver |