Re: .NET driver

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrei Kovalevski <andyk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: .NET driver
Date: 2007-08-02 22:19:36
Message-ID: 46B25878.8080803@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Brar Piening wrote:
> Robert Treat schrieb:
>> That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers,
>> so I'd
> Your'e right - of course.
>
> But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their
> interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good interfaces
> and some of the PostgreSQL-interfaces don't reach the standard they
> are reaching for other databases.
> As a windows-user I still can't drag and drop a Dataset in VS.Net with
> Npgsql and I still have to build a single-threaded perl if i want to
> use DBD::Pg (I know about DBD::PgPP).
>
>

This latter is simply not true.

ActiveState Perl is threaded and DBD::Pg works just fine with it. In
fact, you don't need to build your own - just get the one from pgfoundry:

point your ppm at: http://dbdpgppm.projects.postgresql.org//DBD-Pg-5.8.ppd

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-08-03 01:57:27 Tracking a snapshot on PITR slaves
Previous Message Brar Piening 2007-08-02 22:05:54 Re: .NET driver