Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Date: 2007-07-16 09:40:50
Message-ID: 469B3D22.5030508@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> EDB the *product* is based on PostgreSQL and adds Oracle compatibility
>> features as well as DynaTune and other performance improvements
>> (virtually all of which get offered back to the community),
> Do I miss something or has DynaTune' features not been offered back so far?
> While I regard Oracle features as beyond pgsql's scope, automatic tuning
> appears as valuable extension to core pgsql.

Hi Andreas,

DynaTune has not been offered back as far as I'm aware. I do not know if
management are intending to do so in the future.

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-07-16 12:11:22 Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Previous Message David Fetter 2007-07-14 22:04:38 Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease