Re: usleep feature for pgbench

On 7/7/2007 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Jan Wieck wrote:
>>> You mean as a second, optional argument? Good idea.
>
>> I think it should only be one argument, with the units being part of the
>> variable value, if any.
>
> No, because that makes it hard to do things like "sleep for a small
> random number of microseconds". If pgbench had string concatenation
> ability in its metalanguage then what you suggest would be sensible,
> but let us not go there.

That is exactly the reason why I made it an optional argument. The usage
example in the README file shows how to actually do a random sleep
between 1000 and 2500 ms.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #