Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kgrittn(dot)CCAP(dot)Courts(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...
Date: 2007-07-03 22:22:26
Message-ID: 468A85D1.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2007 at 5:17 PM, in message
<468A84A1(dot)EE98(dot)0025(dot)0(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "Kevin Grittner"
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>
> We have a 406GB table where 304GB is in one table. The next two tables

It's probably obvious, but I meant a 406GB database. Sorry.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-03 22:34:02 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-07-03 22:17:38 Re: Proposal: In-Place upgrade concept

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-03 22:34:02 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2007-07-03 22:17:22 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...