Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-20 21:25:42
Message-ID: 46799B56.2010005@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> If SQL was not a popular standard, we would drop it. You and Alvaro are
>> saying that 'm' for meter and 'min' for minute is commonly recognized
>> outside the USA/UK, so that is good enough for me to say that the
>> existing setup is fine.
>
> If we're not going to make the units-parsing any more friendly, for
> gosh sakes let's at least make it give a HINT about what it will accept.

yeah a proper HINT seem like a very reasonable compromise ...

Stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-06-20 21:38:18 Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-20 21:18:31 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent