| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Moving the website project from GBorg |
| Date: | 2007-06-12 16:42:33 |
| Message-ID: | 466ECCF9.1000308@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 12 June 2007 11:02, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:53:11PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>>>>> If we're going to go through this trouble, is there some reason not to
>>>>>> put up a public trac site some place and make use of it?
>>>>> Seems a little overkill no? It's not like any of it would be used, other
>>>>> than the SVN interface.
>>>> I use Trac as a svn browser all the time, FWIW. I like it a lot more than
>>>> viewcvs or whatever it is you use for pgadmin ;-) But that's just a matter
>>>> of taste. Either one *works* fine :)
>>>>
>>> Well, you get integrated SVN with browser which is good, but also a bug
>>> tracking thingy if people wanted to use that... and a wiki for public
>>> documentation... all kinds of goodies.
>> Pretty much all of which we already have don't we?
>
> well yeah and it is also a bit of duplication of the features we
> (mostly) have on pgfoundry already ...
Right. What we could do is just stick up a trac (or whatever, really)
*until* pgfoundry has svn support.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-06-12 16:43:42 | Re: Moving the website project from GBorg |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-06-12 16:32:53 | Re: Moving the website project from GBorg |