Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Shachar Shemesh <shachar(at)shemesh(dot)biz>, Julian Heeb <heebj2000(at)yahoo(dot)de>, oledb-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server
Date: 2007-05-19 22:08:09
Message-ID: 464F7549.5080007@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> I do recall someone telling me that text mode transfer could actually be
>> faster than binary, somewhat to their (and my) surprise.
>>
>
> Seems a bit improbable --- what was their test case?
>
>
>

No idea - this was idle chat on IRC I think. I am similarly skeptical.
After all, we just had a discussion about improving performance of PLs
by avoiding use of the input/output functions in some cases.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-20 01:11:17 Passing more context info to selectivity-estimation code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-19 21:51:21 Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server