From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
Date: | 2007-05-16 17:48:10 |
Message-ID: | 464B43DA.6050604@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
>>> I the current URLs represent the month, and the ID of the message as
>>> it comes out of the mbox I believe. We could probably write a script
>>> to dump a list of message IDs, directories and mbox positions I
>>> imagine, and then import that into a new database.
>>
>> Yeah, if the files still resemble real emails then we can probably come
>> up with a way to pull the data in.
>
> We have all the mbox files, so we can import them from there as raw
> messages.
yeah, that's clearly the best source to work from. It's *possible* work
from the mhonarc files (I've done it before), but it's more work.
>>> It's been on my list to rewrite the whole archive system for a while
>>> for various reasons. There is quite a bit of crossover with the patch
>>> tracker I proposed so I was hoping to look at both together.
>>
>> Let me know when you start on that...
>
> Roger.
Same here - I've done something similar (off mhonarc files and in much
smaller scale) before, and I'm definitely interested in helping out.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-16 17:54:46 | Re: Invalid magic number in log file? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-16 17:46:31 | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing |