Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Date: 2007-05-14 12:09:31
Message-ID: 4648517B.1060204@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>> So I now state fairly confidently that baiji is failing to overwrite
>> *any* of the installation tree, /share and /bin both, and instead is
>> testing an installation dating from sometime between May 1 and May 11.
>>
>
> Close. There was an Msys build from the 9th running on port 5432.
>
> So, it seems there are a couple of issues here:
>
> 1) There appears to be no way to specify the default port number in the
> MSVC build. The buildfarm passes it to configure for regular builds,
> which obviously isn't run in VC++ mode, thus leaving the build on 5432.
>
> 2) VC++ and Msys builds will both happily start on the same port at the
> same time. The first one to start listens on 5432 until it shuts down,
> at which point the second server takes over seamlessly! It doesn't
> matter which is started first - it's as if Windows is queuing up the
> listens on the port.
>
> Confusingly, the similar behaviour is reproducible on XP Pro, except the
> connection seems to go to the last server started, instead of the first!
>
>
>

I'll look at the port mess.

Are you running 2 buildfarm members on the same machine? If so, you
should look at using the multi-root factility which is explicitly
designed to avoid clashes of this sort.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-14 12:28:36 Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-05-14 11:51:39 Re: Concurrent psql patch