| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Updated bitmap index patch |
| Date: | 2007-05-04 06:55:19 |
| Message-ID: | 463AD8D7.9000402@paradise.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
> I have applied this to todays HEAD performed some quick tests - looks
> good! I have to re-create a TPC-H dataset to test one of the previous
> bugs, so I'll probably look at that tomorrow or so.
>
The TPC-H query query that previously produced a SIGSEGV now runs and
gives the correct answer.
Cheers
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-05-04 07:43:00 | Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-04 03:42:32 | Re: Bitmap Heap Scan anomaly |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Finlay Thompson | 2007-05-04 12:41:02 | Re: Updated bitmap index patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-04 03:57:24 | Re: Hash function for numeric (WIP) |