| From: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL? |
| Date: | 2007-04-13 00:30:30 |
| Message-ID: | 461ECF26.3040701@phlo.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Alexey Klyukin wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> But if you have a checked out tree, does it work to do an update after
>>> the tree has been regenerated? As far as I know, the repo is generated
>>> completely every few hours, so it wouldn't surprise me that the checked
>>> out copy is not compatible with the new repo.
>>>
>>> I admit I haven't tried.
>>>
>> I have tried and svn up worked without issues.
>
> As a note we will be updating this to subversion 1.4 shortly so people
> can do svnsync too.
Do I read this correctly as "This repository will stay around for a while,
and isn't just an experiment that might be stopped tomorrow?". If so, I'll
try using it - and lots of thanks for providing that
greetings, Florian Pflug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve | 2007-04-13 00:34:18 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-13 00:20:06 | Re: Strangely Variable Query Performance |