Re: [DOCS] uuid type not documented

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] uuid type not documented
Date: 2007-04-10 19:49:08
Message-ID: 461BEA34.2040601@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 18:28 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> The problem is that most of the standard methods are platform dependent, as
>> they require MAC addresses or a "good" random source, for instance.
>>
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-01/msg00392.php
>
> ISTM random() or similar sources is a sufficient PSRNG for the purposes
> of UUID generation -- I can't see anything in the RFC that would
> contradict that.
>
>

How about we set up a contrib (I wish we'd fixed that) module with an
example function or two?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-04-10 20:04:36 Re: [DOCS] uuid type not documented
Previous Message Neil Conway 2007-04-10 19:30:52 Re: [DOCS] uuid type not documented

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-10 19:52:00 Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?
Previous Message Kris Kennaway 2007-04-10 19:45:08 Re: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?