From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fix for large file support |
Date: | 2007-04-06 18:36:38 |
Message-ID: | 46169336.50400@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Indeed, but that would be far more effectively addressed by fixing the
> *other* code path that doesn't segment at all (the
> LET_OS_MANAGE_FILESIZE option, which is most likely broken these days
> for lack of testing). I don't see the point of a halfway measure like
> increasing RELSEG_SIZE.
LET_OS_MANAGE_FILESIZE is good way. I think one problem of this option I
fixed. It is size of offset. I went thru the code and did not see any
other problem there. However, how you mentioned it need more testing. I
going to take server with large disk array and I will test it.
I would like to add --enable-largefile switch to configure file to
enable access to wide group of users. What you think about it?
Zdenek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-06 18:45:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-04-06 18:27:15 | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-06 18:45:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-04-06 17:12:59 | Re: Auto Partitioning |