Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch

From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
Date: 2007-04-04 19:35:16
Message-ID: 4613FDF4.50400@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
>
>> So, I should allow DROP DEFAULT, implement
>> SET DEFAULT GENERATED ALWAYS AS
>> and modify the catalog so the GENERATED property
>> is part of pg_attrdef.
>>
>
> Sounds good.
>
>
>> What about IDENTITY?
>> Should it also be part of pg_attrdef? There are two ways
>> to implement it: have or don't have a notion of it.
>> The latter would treat GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY
>> the same as SERIAL.
>>
>
> Is there any good reason to distinguish the two?
>

Yes. Plain SERIALs can be updated with given values
whereas IDENTITY columns cannot. And there is the
difference between GENERATED and GENERATED IDENTITY:
GENERATED columns can updated with DEFAULT
values, IDENTITY columns cannot. I strictly have to
distinguish IDENTITY from both GENERATED and
plain SERIALs.

> regards, tom lane
>

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-04-04 19:40:31 Re: Auto Partitioning
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-04-04 19:34:03 Re: Auto Partitioning

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-04-04 19:40:31 Re: Auto Partitioning
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-04-04 19:34:03 Re: Auto Partitioning