Re: Blocked post

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
>>>> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
>>>> not sure what the problem is?
>>>>
>>>> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
>>>> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
>>> What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-)
>> In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness
>> the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of
>> our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p
>
> Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email
> dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date. Perhaps
> FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating
> them. ;-)
>

Darn, busted! After all that lobbying for a short release cycle we had
to conspire with FAST to extend it again ;-)

/D