| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design |
| Date: | 2007-03-22 11:09:31 |
| Message-ID: | 460263EB.4070502@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> What I am hearing from many users is that its probably not such
> a nice thing to put such restriction. Thats fair. It really helps to think
> about a solution once you know what is acceptable and what is not.
That's likely to be the reaction for almost any restriction you can
imagine. Performance improvements are great, but you can't ask people
for whom current performance is adequate to pay a price in functionality
for them.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | TANIDA Yutaka | 2007-03-22 11:42:08 | Re: "Relation not found" error but table exits. |
| Previous Message | Hubert FONGARNAND | 2007-03-22 09:53:47 | Function cache regeneration |