| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |
| Date: | 2007-03-21 19:00:59 |
| Message-ID: | 460180EB.7040608@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
> any idea how this patch is going to play with hot ? or should I just
> give it a spin, and see if my world collapses :D
I've run tests with both patches applied. I haven't tried with the
latest HOT-versions, but they should in theory work fine together.
You'll get a conflict on the pg_stats-views, both patches add
statistics, but IIRC you can just ignore that and it works. I think
there's a conflict in regression tests as well.
Give it a shot and let me know if there's problems :).
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-21 19:04:48 | Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2007-03-21 18:55:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-03-21 19:44:40 | Re: Make CLUSTER MVCC-safe |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2007-03-21 18:55:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Bitmapscan changes |