Re: PostgreSQL performance question.

From: Harry Jackson <harryjackson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL performance question.
Date: 2005-12-18 02:11:16
Message-ID: 45b42ce40512171811r293e254ex94a4e69910f80466@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 12/15/05, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> PostgreSQL 8.1.1 should give you greater performance...

Indeed it has.

I am seeing a 25% increase in one particular select statement. This
increases to 32% with

set enable_bitmapscan to off;

I also ran a test script full of common SQL that the application runs.
I added some extra SQL to burst the cache a bit and I have managed to
get an average 14% increase.

I have not started tweaking things that much yet to take advantage of
the new parameters so I may yet see more of an increase but initial
indications are that the changes from 7.4.7 to 8.1.1 are significant.

The one thing that may be skewing these results is that this was
compiled and installed from source with

./configure CFLAGS='-O2' --with-openssl --enable-thread-safety

I am not sure what the default Debian binary for 7.4.7 is compiled
with so this may have had some affect.

--
Harry
http://www.hjackson.org
http://www.uklug.co.uk

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2005-12-18 02:18:40 Re: PostgreSQL performance question. [OT]
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-12-18 02:02:48 Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex