Re: PostgreSQL performance question. [OT]

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL performance question. [OT]
Date: 2005-12-18 02:18:40
Message-ID: 20051218021840.GA16308@uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 02:11:16AM +0000, Harry Jackson wrote:
> The one thing that may be skewing these results is that this was
> compiled and installed from source with
>
> ./configure CFLAGS='-O2' --with-openssl --enable-thread-safety
>
> I am not sure what the default Debian binary for 7.4.7 is compiled
> with so this may have had some affect.

This isn't a performance note, but you might be interested in hearing that
there are being maintained official backports of 8.0 and 8.1 for Debian sarge
(by Martin Pitt, the same person who maintains both the sarge and sid
versions). Take a look at

http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/packages/sarge-backports/

It might be more comfortable in the long run than maintaining your own source
installation, although YMMV.

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2005-12-18 04:07:41 Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Previous Message Harry Jackson 2005-12-18 02:11:16 Re: PostgreSQL performance question.