Re: HOT - whats next ?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HOT - whats next ?
Date: 2007-03-05 17:29:00
Message-ID: 45EC535C.9020901@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> The main point is to get a set of functions that can be used directly in
> additional regression tests as well as diagnostics. ISTM we need to
> *prove* HOT works, not just claim it. I'm very open to different
> approaches as to how we might do this.
>
>

Functions to support regression tests don't need to be built-ins. We
already load some extra stuff for regression tests.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-05 17:38:53 Re: HOT - whats next ?
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-03-05 17:22:57 Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant