Re: postgresql vs mysql

From: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>
To: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql vs mysql
Date: 2007-02-23 20:12:30
Message-ID: 45DF4AAE.3040401@nwlink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

That's absolutely correct. What I want is a totally non standard
*optional* extension, recognizing that many, even if not most,
applications could benefit from it. I think there's a clean way to do it.

I would never ask for such a thing if I thought it would effect an out
of the box installation.

-Glen

> If that works for your app, great. But in many (most?) cases it doesn't.
> A survey, for example, might ask for age or income. Some people will
> decline to answer one or both of those questions.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2007-02-23 20:15:41 Re: postgresql vs mysql
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2007-02-23 20:07:56 Re: Priorities for users or queries?