Re: Triggers inherited?

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bertram Scharpf <lists(at)bertram-scharpf(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Triggers inherited?
Date: 2007-02-23 07:10:06
Message-ID: 45DE934E.5050608@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is very inconvenient for me that triggers aren't inherited:

Foreign keys too (which are a special type of trigger of course).

> Is this behaviour to be implemented at any point of time in
> the future? Could it be advisible to write the patch? Or is
> it just too easy to emulate it?

If you have the time and skills, I think many people would be interested
in a patch to handle this.

You will want to check the todo list, developers website and FAQ (and of
course the internals section of the manuals) then discuss things on the
hackers mailing list.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html
http://developer.postgresql.org/
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl O. Pinc 2007-02-23 07:17:15 Supported plpgsql BEFORE ... EACH ROW behavior
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-02-23 05:23:41 Re: postgresql vs mysql