Re: SCMS question

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCMS question
Date: 2007-02-23 03:54:43
Message-ID: 45DE6583.50001@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Warren Turkal wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:00, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>> 1. It has an api that can be written to, that may or may not be helpful
>>> to buildfarm.
>>>
>>> 2. It has mindshare. I know that isn't a big deal to a lot of people
>>> here, but the it is becoming the new cvs. There are others of course
>>> (like monotone) but most projects I know are moving from cvs to svn or
>>> starting with svn.
>>>
>> Git is also pretty cool, too. You can even present a CVS interface on a git
>> repository. That might address the build farm issue.
>>
>
> But it wasn't portable, last time I checked.
>
>

Besides that, the whole idea is that buildfarm should mimic as exactly
as possible how we checkout and build by hand.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Warren Turkal 2007-02-23 03:59:21 Re: SCMS question
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-23 03:39:00 Re: SCMS question